Maria teresa calderon biography of georgetown

Techniques claiming to improve say publicly ability to read quickly

"Speed read" redirects here. For a state summary, see speed read (summary).

Speed reading is any of multitudinous techniques claiming to improve one's ability to read quickly. Speed-reading methods include chunking and minimizing subvocalization.

The many available speed-reading training programs may utilize books, videos, software, and seminars. Almost is little scientific evidence with respect to speed reading, and as neat result its value seems shaky. Cognitive neuroscientist Stanislas Dehaene says that claims of reading manager to 1,000 words per drop "must be viewed with skepticism".^[1]

History

The term "speed reading" is gloomy to have been coined unadorned the late 1950s by Evelyn Wood, a schoolteacher.

She was reportedly curious why some give out were naturally faster at conjure, so tried to force yourselves to read very quickly. Surprise 1958, while brushing off greatness pages of a book she had thrown, she noticed delay the sweeping motion of spread hand across the page beguiled the attention of her seeing, and helped them move mega smoothly across the page.

She then used the hand on account of a pacer. Wood first schooled the method at the Forming of Utah, before launching tackle to the public as Evelyn Wood's Reading Dynamics in General, D.C. in 1959.^[2]

Methods and principles

Skimming and scanning

Skimming is a key up of speed reading that argues visually searching the sentences pleasant a page for clues fight back the main idea or while in the manner tha reading an essay, it receptacle mean reading the beginning gift ending for summary information, mistreatment optionally the first sentence reproach each paragraph to quickly choose whether to seek still work up detail, as determined by ethics questions or purpose of glory reading.^{[3][4][5][6][7]} For some people, that comes naturally, but is by and large acquired by practice.

Skimming stick to usually seen more in adults than in children. It research paper conducted at a higher honour (700 words per minute stall above) than normal reading cart comprehension (around 200–230 wpm), pole results in lower comprehension rates,^[8] especially with information-rich reading material.^[9]

Scanning is the process where separate actively looks for information serviceability a mind-map (organizing information hillock a visually hierarchical manner mosey showcases the interrelatedness of class information for better retrievability) conversant from skimming.^{[citation needed]} These techniques are used by meta-guiding rectitude eyes.

Scanning includes the indication point as well as headings and important information.

Finger tracing

With finger tracing or meta-guiding, readers point to specific lines contract areas (with their fingers), set a limit help focus on the sentences being read (or paragraphs personality skimmed), reduce cognitive load, endure increase retention.^[10][11][2]

Types of reading

There plot three types of reading:

1. Subvocalization: sounding out each word internally, as reading to oneself.

   That is the slowest form worldly reading.

2. Auditory reading: hearing out blue blood the gentry read words. This is spruce up faster process.
3. Visual reading: understanding birth meaning of the word, degree than sounding or hearing. That is the fastest process.

Subvocalization readers (Mental readers) generally read sleepy approximately 250 words per sultry, auditory readers at approximately 450 words per minute and optical discernible readers at approximately 700 word per minute.

Proficient readers negative aspect able to read 280–350 rate without compromising comprehension.^[12]

Effect on comprehension

Skimming is mainly used for repulsive and getting an overall solution of a text, especially just as time is limited. Duggan & Payne (2009) compared skimming slaughter reading normally, given only ample time to read normally raid half of a text.

They found that the main in turn of the full text were better understood after skimming (which could view the full text) than after normal reading (which only read half the text). There was no difference betwixt the groups in their chaos of less important information escape the text.^[13] Skimming or leaving out over text can also defend in comprehension when layered highway, a process of strategic repertory, is employed.^[14] Further findings advance that trained speed readers suppress a slight advantage in both comprehension and speed to uneducated skimmers.

It is thus indirect by experts that speed-reading remains most useful to those who need "to skim a copious amount of material or be in want of to improve their study skills" and less useful to those who read "highly technical topic that requires careful study show each sentence".^[15]

Software

Computer programs are accessible to help instruct speed connection students.

Some programs present justness data as a serial tow, since the brain handles contents more efficiently by breaking arrest into such a stream in the past parsing and interpreting it.^{[citation needed]} The 2000 National Reading Gore (NRP) report (p. 3-1) seems inhibit support such a mechanism.

To increase speed, some older programs required readers to view nobleness center of the screen long forgotten the lines of text litter it grew longer.

They besides presented several objects (instead have text) that move line indifference line or bounce around excellence screen. Users had to haul the object(s) with only their eyes. A number of researchers criticize using objects instead decay words as an effective credentials method, claiming that the unique way to read faster legal action to read actual text.

Numerous of the newer speed indication programs use built-in text, fairy story they primarily guide users sip the lines of an on-screen book at defined speeds. Frequently, the text is highlighted near indicate where users should best part their eyes. They are categorize expected to read by pronouncing the words but instead obviate read by viewing the name as complete images.

The exercises are also intended to address readers to eliminate subvocalization.

Controversies in speed reading

Common controversies fence in speed reading are between hang over intent and nature with arranged concepts like comprehension versus senseless, reading versus skimming, and public psychology versus evidence-based psychology.

Luxurious of the controversy is concave over these points. This attempt mainly because a reading brains level of 50% is alleged unusable by some educationalists.^[16] Advocates claim that speed reading admiration a great success and guarantee it is a demonstration observe good comprehension for many purposes.^[17] The trade-off between speed esoteric comprehension must be analyzed bump into respect to the type vacation reading that is being look, the risks associated with misreading due to low comprehension, person in charge the benefits associated with basis through the material quickly additional gaining information at the valid rate is to be derivative.

Mark Seidenberg considers claims all but reading 25,000 words per oppressive "cannot be true given standoffish facts about eyes and texts". He goes on to speak that "people are as expected to read thousands of vicious per minute as they be cautious about to run faster than say publicly speed of light".^[18]

Similarly, in evaluating a claim that a homogenous reading strategy known as PhotoReading could increase reading rates strut 25,000 words per minute, McNamara published a preliminary analysis funded by NASA to evaluate nolens volens this strategy could improve connection speed, comprehension, and information gettogether efficiency.

When identical versions vacation five reading samples and ensuant reading comprehension tests were administered to a trainee and brainstorm expert in this reading scheme, there was no advantage unimportant overall reading time or intelligence. This strategy may also energy overestimation of one's knowledge, orangutan demonstrated by the following file in McNamara's preliminary analysis, turning up evidence of the Dunning-Kruger effect:^[19]

The final task given to rendering PhotoReading expert was to get the three chapters from greatness textbook on Physiology in uneasiness to take an exam chomp through a course that used stroll textbook.

The question was simply: Would she pass the exam? The expert took 73 action to PhotoRead and read probity three chapters of the primer required for the test (i.e., 361 words per minute). She PhotoRead for 9 minutes rectitude night before taking the likes and dislikes. The following morning, she recite the text using various speedy reading and activation techniques.

She then answered the questions. She completed the 6 true/false take 30 multiple choice questions, on the other hand did not attempt to reply the fill-in-the-blank or short-answer questions. Hence, comprehension performance on loftiness conceptual questions was 0 percentage. She answered 2 of 7 multiple-choice prior knowledge questions right (29%).

Of the text relative questions, she answered 4 a mixture of 6 true/false questions correctly (67%), and 8 of 23 multiple-choice question correctly (35%). This close watch is extremely low and one and only slightly above chance level track record for these types of questions (i.e., 50% and 25%, respectively). In sum, she did grizzle demand pass the exam.

It hype important to note that rearguard PhotoReading the text (but earlier taking the test), she faithful her understanding of the news as 4.5 on a 5-point scale (5 representing a fine understanding). Moreover, she estimated ditch she would remember approximately 68 percent of the material broach the test, with a evaluate of C+.

This high dwindling of confidence in terms go along with her text comprehension would maintain remained unshattered had she pule then taken the test – after which she rated respite comprehension much lower (i.e., 2)

In a 2016 article^[20] promulgated in the journal of Psychological Science in the Public Interest, the authors conclude there task no "magic bullet" for feel like more quickly while maintaining intelligence other than to practice take on and to become a work up skilled language user (e.g.

be diagnosed with increased vocabulary). The authors ramble with debunking common speed would like techniques such as eliminating sub-vocalization, reading more than one brief conversation at a time a.k.a. pigeonholing, using RSVP (Rapid Serial Optic Presentation), increasing peripheral vision, checked colors for each line bring into the light text.

Marshall McLuhan was at or in the beginning a convert to speed measurement, however later concluded it was only useful for tasks liking "scanning junk mail".

U.S. Number one John F. Kennedy was topping proponent of speed reading,^[21] sure his staff to take coaching, and he suggested in type interview that he had keen reading speed of 1,200 paragraph per minute.^[22] U.S.

President Lever Carter, and his wife Rosalynn, were both avid readers obtain enrolled in a speed-reading global at the White House,^[23] at the head with several staff members.

Ronald Carver, a professor of tending research and psychology, claims zigzag the fastest college graduate readers can read only about 600 words per minute, at ascendant twice as fast as their slowest counterparts, and suggests become absent-minded Kennedy's claimed reading speed was more a measure of trade show fast he could skim a-one piece of text.^[24] Other critics have suggested that speed boulevard is actually skimming, not reading.^[25]

The World Championship Speed Reading Contention stresses reading comprehension as depreciatory.

The top contestants typically recite around 1,000 to 2,000 time per minute with approximately 50% comprehension or above. The six-time world champion Anne Jones not bad recorded for 4200 wpm able previous exposure to the substance and 67% comprehension. The taped number of words the qualified can see in single point is three words.^[26]

"Speed Reading Globe Record" claims have been dubitable.

Howard Stephen Berg from magnanimity United States has claimed connected with be the Guinness World Draw up holder for fast reading zone a speed of 25,000 text per minute,^[27] and Maria Nun Calderon from the Philippines claims to have earned the Thespian World Record for World's Copy Reader at 80,000 words break down minute reading speed and 100% comprehension.^[28] Critics point out lose one\'s train of thought it is possible to in the know some speed reading world chronicles by reading a pre-read stratagem pre-memorized text, flipping the pages as fast as possible broke reading it.

The Guinness Simple-minded Reading World Record Standards curb not known and they be endowed with terminated^[when?] adding speed readers dealings its honor list. In 2015, Memoriad, the World Mental Amusements Federation, set the rules lend a hand "Speed Reading World Record Standards" in order to prevent unintelligible dumb claims.^[29][30]

See also

References

Further reading

External links