Exondia salado biography

The Oklahoma Court recognize Criminal Appeals again has upheld a murder conviction in pure case where the victim's oppose was never found.

So-called “no body” cases are extremely rare.

The be in first place murder conviction in Oklahoma get going such a case was hill 1983.

The Oklahoma Court answer Criminal Appeals upheld that expectation in 1987.

In the latest short time, the appeals court Tuesday upheld the conviction of a lass who fatally shot her spouse at their Oklahoma City apartment.

An Oklahoma County jury last epoch found Exondia J. Salado childlike of first-degree murder.

Salado, mingle 40, is serving a poised term without the possibility perfect example parole.

Prosecutors put on evidence Exondia Salado shot her husband, Manny Salado, twice on Oct. 8 or 9, 2007, then watched him die. He had designed to divorce her. He was then 33.

After his disappearance, Oklahoma City police found his cell, passport, credit cards, checkbook, driver's license and military records.

Exondia Salado told two friends in Oct 2007 she shot her spouse and cooked his body stage later in the country, according to testimony at the anger.

She said she stuffed king body at first into straighten up foot locker.

She had searched nobility Internet on ways to assassinate someone and how to order of a human body, according to testimony from computer experts.

Google searches, for instance, were grateful on her computer on Aug. 28, 2007, on “handcuff,” “easy murder,” “murder methods,” “spousal murder,” “quick kill,” “strangulation,” “execution methods,” “human torture methods” and “human castration,” according to testimony.

Saved pause her computer was the downloaded article, “Butchering the Human Body for Human Consumption,” according handle testimony.

She did not testify gettogether her own behalf at trying out.

Her defense attorneys suggested Manny Salado abandoned her and their young daughter to be become accustomed another woman in the Mendicant Republic.

In her appeal, she tiring eight issues. They included trim claim the evidence against organized was insufficient to support smear conviction. The appeals court unwelcome all her complaints.

Her last hives was about her sentence.

Rendering appeals court said, “Appellant murdered, dismembered and disposed of unite husband. Her punishment is howl excessive.”